Building with Triangles *
G-GPE.4, G-GPE.5, GPE.7, F-LE.1, F-LE.2, A-CED.2: Investigate with geometric figures, constructing figures in the plane, relating the distance formula to the Pythagorean Theorem, noticing how areas and perimeters of polygons change as the coordinates change. Build with triangles and quadrilaterals, noticing positions and movement, and creating equations that model the changing edges using technology. (CDE 2023, 58)
California Department of Education. 2023. Mathematics Framework Chapter 8. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.
Big Idea Success Criteria
The categories and their related standards below unpack the success criteria of this big idea.
Primary Standards
- Use coordinates to prove simple geometric theorems algebraically. [Include distance formula; relate to Pythagorean Theorem.] (G-GPE.4, G-GPE.5, GPE.7) (CDE 2013, 74)
- G-GPE.4. Use coordinates to prove simple geometric theorems algebraically (CDE 2013, 74).
- G-GPE.5. Prove the slope criteria for parallel and perpendicular lines and use them to solve geometric problems (e.g., find the equation of a line parallel or perpendicular to a given line that passes through a given point) (CDE 2013, 74).
- G-GPE.7. Use coordinates to compute perimeters of polygons and areas of triangles and rectangles, e.g., using the distance formula (CDE 2013, 74).
Secondary Standards
- Construct and compare linear, quadratic, and exponential models and solve problems. [Linear and exponential] (F-LE.1, F-LE.2) (CDE 2013, 67)
- F-LE.1. Distinguish between situations that can be modeled with linear functions and with exponential functions.
- Prove that linear functions grow by equal differences over equal intervals, and that exponential functions grow by equal factors over equal intervals.
- Recognize situations in which one quantity changes at a constant rate per unit interval relative to another.
- Recognize situations in which a quantity grows or decays by a constant percent rate per unit interval relative to another. (CDE 2013, 67-68)
- F-LE.2. Construct linear and exponential functions, including arithmetic and geometric sequences, given a graph, a description of a relationship, or two input-output pairs (include reading these from a table). (CDE 2013, 68)
- F-LE.1. Distinguish between situations that can be modeled with linear functions and with exponential functions.
- Create equations that describe numbers or relationships. [Linear and exponential (integer inputs only)] (A-CED.2) (CDE 2013, 90)
- A-CED.2. Create equations in two or more variables to represent relationships between quantities; graph equations on coordinate axes with labels and scales (CDE 2013, 90).
California Department of Education. 2013. California Common Core State Standards. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.
Alternative Means of Expression
The following options give educators and IEP teams viable alternative means of expression a student could use when showing their understanding of this big idea. Much of the initiative team’s approach to identifying options centered on developing or adopting performance tasks to show what assessment might look like for this big idea.
Remember, LEAs adopt their own policies related to how a student meets the requirements for graduation. Educators and IEP teams should explore these resources with knowledge of these local policies.
General Guidance with Selecting Options for this Big Idea
For Building with Triangles, students may verbally or in writing explain their construction of triangles and quadrilaterals. Tools such as GeoGebra or Desmos can aid students in visually representing these shapes on a coordinate plane. Students can annotate on their graphs the relationship of the Pythagorean Theorem in their figures and the impact on the area and perimeter when coordinates are changed. They can complete a simplified number of coordinate transformations that alter the shapes and express these changes algebraically verbally, in writing, or using speech-to-text software.
Sample Coursework
Project Created Performance Task
Alternate Means of Expression Option 1 is a performance task created by the project team that represents a viable alternate means of expression a school, district, teacher, or IEP team could utilize as an assessment option for this big idea.
Performance Tasks
Alternate Means of Expression Option 2 represent either a single performance task or a set of performance tasks that have been curated from publicly available task repositories that can be used as a viable assessment option.
Card Sort
Alternate Means of Expression Option 3 represent either a single performance tasks or a set of performance tasks that have been curated from publically avaible task repositories that can be used as a viable assessment option.
General Instructions for Completing the Card Sort Independently
- Starting with a card from Set A: Begin by selecting a card from Set A.
- Find its matching card from Set B: Carefully examine the cards in Set B to identify the one that corresponds or matches with the card from Set A.
- Place cards side by side: As you make matches, place the paired cards side by side on a large sheet of paper. Avoid stacking them on top of each other so that you can easily see all your matches and make revisions if needed.
- Explain your thinking: After making a match, take a moment to clearly and carefully explain your thought process. You can do this by writing down your explanation, recording it on a device, or explaining it aloud to yourself.
- Repeat for Set C, D, etc. (if applicable): If the Card Sort includes an additional set of cards, repeat the above steps for this set as well.
Bring Your Own Task (BYOT)
A Call to IEP Teams
We want students’ IEP team members to share their ideas regarding viable alternative means of expression pertaining to this big idea for students with disabilities, including those eligible for the CAA, these teams serve. IEP teams can define viable alternative means of expression for an individual student with an IEP, as long as these mediums meet the local requirements of the coursework.
A Call to Content-based Educators
In addition to IEP teams, we know secondary teachers and district curriculum leads have a wealth of experience and ideas related to innovative ways to assess students’ understanding of this content. We are interested in sample alternative means of expression this community sees as viable assessments of this big idea.
Please use the entry boxes below to share these ideas.
Important Note —These assessment tools will not be shared outside the review of the initiative team and will remain the intellectual property of the users who have made this submission. Furthermore, feedback or comments from the initiative team will not be given to uploaded content, nor does uploading materials imply that the alternative means of expression strategy is a viable option for this big idea.
"*" indicates required fields